« Women are More Concerned About Identity Theft than Men | Main | Funny Money Friday: National Protection Week Anagram Challenge »

Vote for the Worst Credit Criminal of the Year

We've been talking all week about the most common and heinous scams of 2006. As we near the end of National Consumer Protection Week, let's see who gets your vote for the worst credit criminal of 2006. In our definition, credit criminals are the scammers, con artists and general bottom-feeders who try to steal from innocent consumers using deception. Cast your vote today!

Don't see your pick for the worst credit criminal on this list? Share your nomination for the worst of the worst in the comments section below.


Send this article to:

Posted by credit.com on February 08, 2007 at 04:27 PM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/542753/16006002

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vote for the Worst Credit Criminal of the Year:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Subscribe to the CreditBloggers RSS feed today! Copy one of these links into your blog reader:

About CreditBloggers

Bringing together leading experts to discuss credit, loan, debt and identity theft topics, CreditBloggers provides readers with unique insight and straight answers about the financial world. This credit blog is moderated by Emily Davidson, formerly a TransUnion consumer credit expert.

Click here to read more about the team of financial gurus who contribute to CreditBloggers.com

Visit Credit.com for:




© 2005-2007 Creditbloggers.com. All rights reserved

Disclaimer: This information has been compiled and provided by Creditbloggers.com as a service to the public. While our goal is to provide information that will help consumers to manage their credit and debt, this information should not be considered legal advice. Such advice must be specific to the various circumstances of each person's situation, and the general information provided on these pages should not be used as a substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.